Peter Helped me with a case these last few months. Always explained everything in depth. Can’t say enough good things about how it went.
Years Of Experience
Recovered
You can’t go wrong with [Bruntrager & Billings P.C.]. Don’t just trust my word for it though. See for yourself or better yet, ask other attorneys who they would personally use. I’m sure you’d hear not just one, but several of [their] names.
Peter Helped me with a case these last few months. Always explained everything in depth. Can’t say enough good things about how it went.
I’ve dealt with Charlie and he is wonderful. VERY knowledgeable of the law. I would definitely recommend if you are facing hardship.
You can’t go wrong with any of them. Don’t just trust my word for it though. See for yourself or better yet, ask other attorneys who they would personally use. I’m sure you’d hear not just one, but several of the names above.
“I find the law firm of Bruntrager & Billings, P.C. to be totally professional, compassionate and caring. They do their homework to get results. Their whole staff is there with you all the way. Charles W. Billings was there with us from day one working the case and keeping us informed every step of the way. I have total confidence and trust with him as our attorney and now think of him as a friend. This is a wonderful family law firm and would highly recommend them to anyone.”
Most business partnerships start with shared goals and a good working relationship. Problems tend to surface later, when the business grows, money gets tight, or one partner’s plans change. Some disagreements resolve with a hard conversation. Others escalate into lockouts, missing funds, and threats of litigation.
For St. Louis business owners, knowing which kind of dispute you are facing affects what you should do next. This guide covers the most common causes of business partner disputes, the signs that a conflict is becoming serious, the options for resolving it, and the situations where legal help becomes necessary.
Many people who call themselves business partners are not partners in the legal sense. The rules that govern a dispute depend on how the business is organized:
The structure affects nearly everything that follows, including what duties co-owners owe each other, what information each one can demand, and whether a court can order the business dissolved.

Most partner disputes trace back to a few recurring problems.
Disagreements over salaries, distributions, and reinvestment are among the most common sources of conflict. One partner may want to take profits out while another wants to grow the business. Tension also builds when one owner believes they contribute more work than the other but receive the same share.
Partners often start with different roles, such as one contributing capital and the other contributing labor or expertise. Over time, those arrangements can feel unfair, especially if the original terms were never written down.
Disputes arise when one partner makes major decisions without consulting the other, such as signing a lease, taking on debt, or hiring key employees. In a 50/50 business, disagreement on a major decision can lead to deadlock, where the company cannot move forward at all.
A partner may want to retire, sell, bring in a family member, or shift focus to another venture. When the partnership agreement does not address an exit, these changes often become the start of a broader dispute.
Conflict escalates quickly when one partner starts a competing company, diverts customers, or uses business resources for a side venture. This conduct can amount to a breach of fiduciary duty, discussed below.
In Missouri, general partners owe each other fiduciary duties. Under RSMo § 358.210, every partner must account to the partnership for any benefit derived from partnership business or property without the consent of the other partners. In practice, this means partners must act with loyalty and good faith, avoid self-dealing, and not take business opportunities for themselves.
LLC members and corporate shareholders in closely held companies can owe similar duties, though an LLC’s operating agreement may expand, limit, or define them. Examples of conduct that may breach these duties include:
Not every argument calls for legal action. Some developments, however, suggest the relationship has moved past ordinary disagreement:
Any one of these signs can mean your financial interest in the business is at risk. Several together usually mean it is time to talk with a lawyer, whether or not anyone has filed a lawsuit.
Not every partnership dispute ends up in court. The right approach depends on the agreement, the relationship, and what each owner wants from the outcome.
The partnership agreement, operating agreement, or shareholder agreement is the starting point. Many agreements include buy-sell provisions, valuation formulas, deadlock procedures, or mandatory mediation or arbitration clauses. Many disputes are based on how these provisions are interpreted.
Direct negotiation, often with each side represented, resolves many disputes. Mediation brings in a neutral third party to help the owners reach an agreement. It is confidential, usually faster than litigation, and allows the owners to shape their own terms, such as a structured buyout or a revised division of responsibilities.
When the relationship cannot continue, one partner buying out the other is often the most practical outcome. The key issues are valuation, payment terms, releases of claims, and noncompetition or nonsolicitation terms. Accepting a buyout offer without understanding the business’s true value can mean accepting far less than your share is worth.
If the agreement requires arbitration, disputes are decided by a private arbitrator rather than a court. Arbitration can be faster and more private, but it limits appeal rights.
When other options fail, owners can ask a court to resolve the dispute. Possible claims include breach of partnership agreement, breach of fiduciary duty, and requests for an accounting. In some cases, a court can order the business dissolved. For LLCs, RSMo § 347.143 allows judicial dissolution when it is not reasonably practicable to carry on the business in conformity with the operating agreement. For corporations, RSMo § 351.494 allows dissolution in certain cases involving deadlock, oppressive conduct, or waste of corporate assets.

Talking with a lawyer early can help even when the goal is a quiet resolution. In some situations, waiting can cause harm, including:
Knowing your rights under Missouri law and under your governing documents puts you in a better position to protect your interest in the business. If you are facing a conflict with a co-owner and are unsure how to proceed, contact the business law team at Bruntrager & Billings, P.C. at (314) 646-0066 or online to discuss your situation.
Blog
Featured on National and Local News as Legal Analysts and Experts







