Peter Helped me with a case these last few months. Always explained everything in depth. Can’t say enough good things about how it went.
Years Of Experience
Recovered
You can’t go wrong with [Bruntrager & Billings P.C.]. Don’t just trust my word for it though. See for yourself or better yet, ask other attorneys who they would personally use. I’m sure you’d hear not just one, but several of [their] names.
Peter Helped me with a case these last few months. Always explained everything in depth. Can’t say enough good things about how it went.
I’ve dealt with Charlie and he is wonderful. VERY knowledgeable of the law. I would definitely recommend if you are facing hardship.
You can’t go wrong with any of them. Don’t just trust my word for it though. See for yourself or better yet, ask other attorneys who they would personally use. I’m sure you’d hear not just one, but several of the names above.
“I find the law firm of Bruntrager & Billings, P.C. to be totally professional, compassionate and caring. They do their homework to get results. Their whole staff is there with you all the way. Charles W. Billings was there with us from day one working the case and keeping us informed every step of the way. I have total confidence and trust with him as our attorney and now think of him as a friend. This is a wonderful family law firm and would highly recommend them to anyone.”
A criminal record does not just follow someone through background checks and job applications. In Missouri, prior felony convictions can directly affect the sentence a court hands down in a new case.
Missouri’s sentencing enhancement rules are found in RSMo § 558.016, which allows courts to impose longer sentences based on a defendant’s criminal history. The statute defines several categories that carry different consequences at sentencing.
A prior offender under Missouri law is someone who has been found guilty of one prior felony. Prior offender status does not automatically extend the sentencing range for a new offense, but it is treated as an aggravating factor a judge can weigh when deciding where within the authorized range a sentence should fall.
A persistent offender is someone who has been found guilty of two or more felonies committed at different times, or someone previously found guilty of a dangerous felony as defined under RSMo § 556.061. Unlike prior offender status, persistent offender status can trigger an actual extended sentencing range. Under RSMo § 558.016, a defendant sentenced as a persistent offender who is found guilty of a Class B, C, D, or E felony can be sentenced to the authorized term for the offense class one level higher than the one charged.
A dangerous offender is someone being sentenced for a felony in which they knowingly murdered, endangered, or threatened the life of another person, or knowingly inflicted or attempted to inflict serious physical injury, and who has a prior Class A or B felony or dangerous felony conviction. Dangerous offender status can also trigger the extended sentencing ranges described above.
There is also a category for repeat misdemeanor conduct. A persistent misdemeanor offender is someone found guilty of two or more Class A or B misdemeanors committed at different times, which can affect sentencing in certain misdemeanor cases.
Under the statute, the prior findings of guilt must have occurred before the date the new offense was committed. A conviction that came after the current offense was committed generally will not count toward prior or persistent offender status for that case.

Beyond the formal prior and persistent offender categories in RSMo § 558.016, Missouri judges also have access to advisory sentencing recommendations published by the Missouri Sentencing Advisory Commission (MOSAC). These recommendations are not mandatory, unlike some federal sentencing structures, and a judge is only required to consider them rather than follow them.
MOSAC’s advisory tool scores an offender’s criminal history using a range of factors, including:
That score places a defendant into a criminal history level, which is then weighed alongside the severity of the current offense to produce an advisory sentencing range.
A defendant with an extensive prior record will generally score at a higher history level, which tends to push the advisory range toward longer prison terms and away from probation eligibility, even in cases where the formal persistent offender enhancement under RSMo § 558.016 does not apply.
Courts typically rely on a presentence investigation report prepared by the Missouri Board of Probation and Parole to document this history before sentencing.
The difference between prior offender and persistent offender status is not just a technical label. A prior offender finding allows a judge to consider the earlier conviction as one factor among many, but it does not change the statutory range available for the current offense. A persistent offender or dangerous offender finding can change that range entirely, exposing a defendant to a sentence one felony class higher than the crime charged.
Because the enhancement depends on how the prosecution proves the prior convictions and how the timing lines up with the current offense, the accuracy of the record matters. Errors in charging documents, misclassified out-of-state convictions, or convictions that do not actually meet the statutory definition can all affect whether an enhancement applies.
Sentencing enhancements do not only come into play at the final sentencing hearing. They tend to determine how a case is charged and negotiated from the start. When a prosecutor knows a defendant’s record supports a persistent offender or dangerous offender finding under RSMo § 558.016, that finding becomes leverage in plea discussions, since a jury trial conviction could expose the defendant to a sentence one felony class higher than the crime charged.
This is part of why the state must formally plead and prove prior offender or persistent offender status. The prosecution typically has to give notice of the enhancement and establish the qualifying convictions through certified court records, not just an arrest history or a probation officer’s summary. A defense attorney reviewing those records can sometimes identify convictions that do not actually meet the statutory definition, such as a conviction that was later set aside, a charge that was amended down to a non-qualifying offense, or an out-of-state conviction that does not map cleanly onto a Missouri felony classification.
Timing also plays a role in negotiations. Because RSMo § 558.016 requires that qualifying prior findings of guilt occur before the date the new offense was committed, the specific sequence of dates in a defendant’s record can determine whether an enhancement is even available to the prosecution in the first place.
A persistent offender or dangerous offender finding does not just raise the potential maximum sentence. It can also narrow, or in some cases eliminate, eligibility for probation on certain offenses.
Missouri’s criminal code restricts probation availability for various Class A and B felonies, and a persistent offender enhancement layered on top of an already serious charge can push a case further away from a probation-eligible range under the MOSAC advisory guidelines described above. This is one reason criminal history accuracy matters just as much during pretrial proceedings as it does at the sentencing hearing itself.
A single prior felony establishes prior offender status under RSMo § 558.016, which a judge may weigh as an aggravating factor. It does not, by itself, extend the authorized sentencing range the way persistent offender or dangerous offender status can.
Two or more felony convictions from different occasions generally establish persistent offender status under RSMo § 558.016. A single prior conviction for certain dangerous felonies can also qualify someone as a persistent offender under the statute.
No. The Missouri Sentencing Advisory Commission’s recommendations are advisory only. Judges are required to consider them but retain discretion to sentence above or below the suggested range based on the facts of the case.
Prior convictions from other states can potentially count, depending on how the offense is classified and whether it would qualify as a felony under Missouri law. This is often a contested issue in sentencing hearings.
Sentencing enhancements can turn a routine charge into a case with dramatically higher stakes, and the difference often comes down to how prior convictions are documented and argued in court. If this sounds like your situation, the team at Bruntrager & Billings, P.C. may be able to help you understand how your criminal history could affect your case. Contact us today to learn more.
Blog
Featured on National and Local News as Legal Analysts and Experts







